Some low budget advertisers fear that if a competitor clicks on their adverts early in the morning, that the budget will be exhausted and they’ll have no spend for the rest of the day. We’ve not seen this pattern in any of our clients’ accounts, but it is often asserted in the AdWords Help forum that this is a serious concern. There’s a general buzz about click fraud at the moment.
We’ve had a think about this specific early-day-competitor-clicking problem and we have some ideas to avoid it. You’ll need some background information first, but we think this idea will work effectively, and doesn’t offer a simple response for a competitor who is behaving aggressively.
At midnight, Google starts a budget for a new day. Unless you’ve deliberately told AdWords to do it differently (accelerated advert serving), Google will ration out your adverts over the day. It divides your budget by what it thinks you could spend if you appeared every time, and then uses that ratio.
Example:
- You offer $10/day
- AdWords estimates $100/day
- Google serves your advert 1 in 10 times
OK, so that was easy. Now, your competitor comes along at 08:30 in the morning. Fires up a browser and does some searches, clicking madly on your adverts. He only gets to see you 1 in 10 times. However, the CTR you get is surprisingly large. Google recalculates… If you are getting this type of CTR, it’ll need to throttle the adverts even more… So after a little while, you’ve reached 1 impression in 100 opportunities and your competitor goes off, satisfied that you are dead for the day and will get no real visitors.
Chances are that your real targets for search aren’t searching in volume at that time of day. Most consumer markets heat up around lunch time. You can run an “hourly” breakdown to see what volume of impressions you get exposed to. With a limited budget, it isn’t a perfect representation of the daily profile, but it’ll give a feel for when most users are online.
Here’s the trick. Make your midnight, after the start of the day, before the real users come online. That is, if you know that the search peak starts at 11:30 in the morning, local time, make your accounts’ midnight, 11:00 local time. That way, the best that a competitor can do first thing in the morning, is to attack your budget after most of it is spent. If you make the accounts’ midnight, your noon, then you are well into the customer search day, before you start spending your daily budget. Your competitor can’t get access to your unspent budget, but waits until the budget is nearly exhausted, towards the end of the accounts day.
This needs a diagram… or two:


Those diagrams should make it clear. By offering the budget to real users, first, the competitor only gets to see the tail end of the budget. You can spend more on your clients and less on competitors. And your competitor will find it hard to predict when your budget day starts, making it difficult to target a time when the maximum damage can be caused.
Following a suggestion by John Krystynak on Andrew Goodman’s SEM2 Forum, can you do better? Maybe. If you use Google’s “Accelerated delivery”, you no longer have the adverts dribbled out, but fed as fast as people click. The risk is that many people do the same search repeatedly, so you may have the advert clicked on a few times, outside the limits set by Google’s Invalid Click Detection for double clicking and below the rates needed to trigger any other invalid click criterion (hypothetical speculation here – Google does not publish how their invalid click detection works). However, if your audience is conservative with multiple clicking, then you may be able to exhaust your budget when likely buyers are online and before the competitor comes online to attack.
Caution: You can only set your timezone for your account – the “midnight” that you want – ONCE for an account. Get it wrong and you’ll need to set up another account. Adjusting the “accelerated delivery” can be done multiple times in a day (do it once every other day or every other week to try and measure the effectiveness, though).

Karen wrote,
This post is great, I like this. My client is using Adwords to advertise his website. I must warn him… Thanks for your post. Please post more if you have additional informations about this.. Thanks.
Link | March 14th, 2008 at 10:04 am
PontoPR wrote,
What if someone creates a program that, using a proxy server to mask the IP address, is constantly, during all day, clicking randomly on you banner? How can we prevent this? What measures does Google offer?
Link | August 31st, 2009 at 10:58 am
Jeremy Chatfield wrote,
@PontoPR – there is a point at which a question shifts emphasis from being “I am an advertiser looking for protection” to “I am a hacker trying to understand how Google defends itself from me”. I don’t work for Google (so I have no serious inside information to disclose), and I have no interest in making it easier to attack other advertisers costs; I feel that your question doesn’t come from the defenders side of the fence, so I’m not going to give a straight answer.
There are mechanisms that I can imagine that will allow the detection of unusual patterns of behaviour – there’s an entire field of academic research and military intelligence devoted to detecting signals hidden in noisy data, for example. I’ve used some of it in fields such as low energy housing research – detecting the signals of weather and climate in domestic energy use. There are some similarities, oddly enough.
Link | August 31st, 2009 at 11:32 am
tetra wrote,
PontoPR
I think/know i have one of those proxy programs working on my site and i think whoever has created it is not going to ever take it off.
I have contacted google several times and they have done absolutely nothing even though my ctr is through the roof and my sales are in the basement. I used to make around 1 sale for every 5 clicks, now it is 1 sale for every 30 clicks. I have a low profit margin product, and google adwords is becoming too expensive now.
I don’t know how to solve the problem, i think i know who it is that has created the proxy program, but i don’t have any evidence.
I dont want to change my branding/website domain because its a good brand and too well known now.
Link | April 2nd, 2010 at 3:01 pm