<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.12-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Someone else is annoyed by Google&#8217;s duplicity</title>
	<link>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/10/19/someone-else-is-annoyed-by-googles-duplicity/</link>
	<description>Effective Internet Marketing Strategy and Technique Through Experiments, Measurement and Audit</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.12-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jeremy Chatfield</title>
		<link>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/10/19/someone-else-is-annoyed-by-googles-duplicity/#comment-26</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 07:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/10/19/someone-else-is-annoyed-by-googles-duplicity/#comment-26</guid>
					<description>Hi Dave - the problem is made worse by Google enabling Content Match as a default. New advertisers tend to have poorly focused keywords and adverts, and are often not aware of how to monitor performance or manage it. Exposing these advertisers, by default, to the most hazardous targeting system, is abusing the ignorance of new advertisers and encourages the construction of AdWords  arbitrage sites and other less than ethical behaviour. These advertisers are unlikely to know how to detect a problem or what to do about it to protect themselves or to recover costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave - the problem is made worse by Google enabling Content Match as a default. New advertisers tend to have poorly focused keywords and adverts, and are often not aware of how to monitor performance or manage it. Exposing these advertisers, by default, to the most hazardous targeting system, is abusing the ignorance of new advertisers and encourages the construction of AdWords  arbitrage sites and other less than ethical behaviour. These advertisers are unlikely to know how to detect a problem or what to do about it to protect themselves or to recover costs.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dave B</title>
		<link>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/10/19/someone-else-is-annoyed-by-googles-duplicity/#comment-25</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 06:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/10/19/someone-else-is-annoyed-by-googles-duplicity/#comment-25</guid>
					<description>You could call these sites 'spad' sites (SPamAD). The guy is right though. Only when enough people complain and the media starts grumbling will Google/Yahoo et al apply their own rules and close down these affiliates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could call these sites &#8217;spad&#8217; sites (SPamAD). The guy is right though. Only when enough people complain and the media starts grumbling will Google/Yahoo et al apply their own rules and close down these affiliates.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
