<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.12-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google AdWords now charges advertisers for broken API Beta</title>
	<link>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/11/03/google-adwords-now-charges-advertisers-for-broken-api-beta/</link>
	<description>Effective Internet Marketing Strategy and Technique Through Experiments, Measurement and Audit</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.12-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jeremy Chatfield</title>
		<link>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/11/03/google-adwords-now-charges-advertisers-for-broken-api-beta/#comment-52</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 08:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/11/03/google-adwords-now-charges-advertisers-for-broken-api-beta/#comment-52</guid>
					<description>Hi Jeff, thanks for the comment. 

Alternatives? Try MSN AdCenter and Yahoo!Search Marketing (but only if you get the Panama interface). Don't use anything else without a decent click fraud detection and reporting system. You are reasonably safe from click fraud on Google, Y!SM and MSN AdCenter if you stick to keyword search. Avoid contextual search without a good click identification system. 

The "Active" thing - it was an attempt to simplify a previously more complex field that included information about why the adverts weren't running. Users found the plethora of reasons confusing, it seems. So it was turned into "active/inactive". But that disguises a host of internal states that "active" represents and also a bunch of different reasons that "inactive" represents. We've become quite good at interpreting what Google means, by looking at the other signs and signals. The value of the MinCPC tells you meaningful information, for example. They just don't document it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff, thanks for the comment. </p>
<p>Alternatives? Try MSN AdCenter and Yahoo!Search Marketing (but only if you get the Panama interface). Don&#8217;t use anything else without a decent click fraud detection and reporting system. You are reasonably safe from click fraud on Google, Y!SM and MSN AdCenter if you stick to keyword search. Avoid contextual search without a good click identification system. </p>
<p>The &#8220;Active&#8221; thing - it was an attempt to simplify a previously more complex field that included information about why the adverts weren&#8217;t running. Users found the plethora of reasons confusing, it seems. So it was turned into &#8220;active/inactive&#8221;. But that disguises a host of internal states that &#8220;active&#8221; represents and also a bunch of different reasons that &#8220;inactive&#8221; represents. We&#8217;ve become quite good at interpreting what Google means, by looking at the other signs and signals. The value of the MinCPC tells you meaningful information, for example. They just don&#8217;t document it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/11/03/google-adwords-now-charges-advertisers-for-broken-api-beta/#comment-49</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/11/03/google-adwords-now-charges-advertisers-for-broken-api-beta/#comment-49</guid>
					<description>I've only recently gotten into Adwords, but ran across your blog because I am already feeling the same way. I haven't even come close to considering using their API, as it seems to me that they can't even get their advertiser's interface to work. The "active" compaign/keyword status seems to be the most deceiving part of it, and it is widely published on the net to be a headache, and yet they have not done anything to fix the problem.

I think that at this point, they are just trying to attract new advertisers so they can leach our keywords and add them to their keyword tool...They're probably using to somehow make Google search smarter, as well.

Have you found a good alternative yet? I was looking at AdBrite, but its a different animal (differently delivery).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only recently gotten into Adwords, but ran across your blog because I am already feeling the same way. I haven&#8217;t even come close to considering using their API, as it seems to me that they can&#8217;t even get their advertiser&#8217;s interface to work. The &#8220;active&#8221; compaign/keyword status seems to be the most deceiving part of it, and it is widely published on the net to be a headache, and yet they have not done anything to fix the problem.</p>
<p>I think that at this point, they are just trying to attract new advertisers so they can leach our keywords and add them to their keyword tool&#8230;They&#8217;re probably using to somehow make Google search smarter, as well.</p>
<p>Have you found a good alternative yet? I was looking at AdBrite, but its a different animal (differently delivery).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
