<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.12-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Google - Accessibility Technologies and CAPTCHA</title>
	<link>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/11/30/good-google-accessibility-technologies-and-captcha/</link>
	<description>Effective Internet Marketing Strategy and Technique Through Experiments, Measurement and Audit</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.12-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jeremy Chatfield</title>
		<link>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/11/30/good-google-accessibility-technologies-and-captcha/#comment-185</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/11/30/good-google-accessibility-technologies-and-captcha/#comment-185</guid>
					<description>Well - damn - you're right. All those people telling me that character recognition was a tricky problem, defeated by raw power of spam. I guess if I'd ever deployed CAPTCHA, I'd have known. :)

I wonder if there's a way to get spammers to tackle any other issues in AI. AI is *always* 10 years away...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well - damn - you&#8217;re right. All those people telling me that character recognition was a tricky problem, defeated by raw power of spam. I guess if I&#8217;d ever deployed CAPTCHA, I&#8217;d have known. :)</p>
<p>I wonder if there&#8217;s a way to get spammers to tackle any other issues in AI. AI is *always* 10 years away&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John K</title>
		<link>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/11/30/good-google-accessibility-technologies-and-captcha/#comment-184</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/11/30/good-google-accessibility-technologies-and-captcha/#comment-184</guid>
					<description>Actually, in the spam wars, long means 1 week, not 1 or 10 years.  

Spammers &#38; hackers have already perfected ways to defeat most CAPTCHAs without much hassle.

So now, CAPTCHAs are mostly impediments for the normal user.

Similarly, anyone who thinks they are protecting their email by using:

bob (at) bla (dot) com

or anything similar, is simply naive.  In fact, do a google search like this:

*(at)*(dot)

 and you'll see you've just made it insanely to find those emails :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, in the spam wars, long means 1 week, not 1 or 10 years.  </p>
<p>Spammers &amp; hackers have already perfected ways to defeat most CAPTCHAs without much hassle.</p>
<p>So now, CAPTCHAs are mostly impediments for the normal user.</p>
<p>Similarly, anyone who thinks they are protecting their email by using:</p>
<p>bob (at) bla (dot) com</p>
<p>or anything similar, is simply naive.  In fact, do a google search like this:</p>
<p>*(at)*(dot)</p>
<p> and you&#8217;ll see you&#8217;ve just made it insanely to find those emails :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
