<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.12-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Writes About Click Fraud</title>
	<link>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/12/14/google-writes-about-click-fraud/</link>
	<description>Effective Internet Marketing Strategy and Technique Through Experiments, Measurement and Audit</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.12-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jeremy Chatfield</title>
		<link>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/12/14/google-writes-about-click-fraud/#comment-659</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/12/14/google-writes-about-click-fraud/#comment-659</guid>
					<description>Hi Rich@Apogee! Thanks for the link. And your comments :)

Interesting - I've a few niggles with it. I'm no fan of the way that Google treats advertisers. Their internal view appears to be that all advertisers are greedy scamsters, that agencies are even worse, since they are also stoopid and that AdWords API programmers are the worst of the bunch being greedy, stupid and incompetent enough that uniquely of all Google's API users they must be charged a fee just in case they waste Google's resources. 

However, I think the "12 ways" casts undue doubt on rising revenues. I think I'll articulate in an article, not a comment... Too long for a comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi <a href="mailto:Rich@Apogee!">Rich@Apogee!</a> Thanks for the link. And your comments :)</p>
<p>Interesting - I&#8217;ve a few niggles with it. I&#8217;m no fan of the way that Google treats advertisers. Their internal view appears to be that all advertisers are greedy scamsters, that agencies are even worse, since they are also stoopid and that AdWords API programmers are the worst of the bunch being greedy, stupid and incompetent enough that uniquely of all Google&#8217;s API users they must be charged a fee just in case they waste Google&#8217;s resources. </p>
<p>However, I think the &#8220;12 ways&#8221; casts undue doubt on rising revenues. I think I&#8217;ll articulate in an article, not a comment&#8230; Too long for a comment!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Richard Ball</title>
		<link>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/12/14/google-writes-about-click-fraud/#comment-656</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.merjis.com/2006/12/14/google-writes-about-click-fraud/#comment-656</guid>
					<description>Pssst, have you seen:
http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/the-twelve-ways-of-click-fraud.html

Check out #12 on the list.  And my delightful comments.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pssst, have you seen:<br />
<a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/the-twelve-ways-of-click-fraud.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/12/the-twelve-ways-of-click-fraud.html</a></p>
<p>Check out #12 on the list.  And my delightful comments.  ;-)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
